CUSTOMERS.COM® RESEARCH FROM THE PATRICIA SEYBOLD GROUP
Nature Reinvents Textbooks
Scitable: A NextGen Ecosystem for Learning & Teaching Science
By Patricia Seybold, CEO & Sr. Consultant/Analyst,
October 1, 2009
NETTING
IT OUT
Scitable (Scitable.com)
is a 21st century online learning resource about genetics for students and
faculty. It's provided for free by Nature Education.
The content is expert-sourced; not crowd-sourced. Yet, there's plenty
of user-generated educational content.
Customers are
faculty and college students and teachers and high school students. Students
can follow
their own "learning paths." Faculty can build
online classrooms to leverage Scitable's content.
Scitable is Nature Education's attempt to replace traditional scientific
textbooks with a new way of engaging students as well as a new business model.
Students look online for resources and information. So, instead of having students
pay $150 for a definitive science textbook, why not have educational institutions
pay for a content- and expert-rich learning community? Why not have sponsors,
who want to hire these students, help foot the bill? Scitable is already exceeding
Nature's expectations in its first year of a two-year trial and a ten-year
strategic plan.
I interviewed Vikram Savkar,
the SVP & Publishing Director at Nature Education,
who led the innovation team at Nature to create and launch Scitable. In this
first part of our case study, we describe what the Nature Education team set
out to accomplish, what they built, and how customers are using it. In our
second installment, we will describe how they built Scitable and what they
learned.
THE QUEST: BLOW UP AND REINVENT THE TEXTBOOK PUBLISHING MODEL
Vikram Savkar
was a publishing revolutionary with a history of product innovations looking
for an opportunity
to implement a bolder, disruptive strategy than
was possible at the traditional players. "I started out in the textbook
publishing industry. We created custom publishing solutions. This seems like
a fantastic new direction for the industry, but every custom book cannibalized
the print text book. At my former employer, we had a billion dollar textbook
base. We needed to grow revenues three percent per year. The traditional textbook
was still in the driver's seat of that strategy; yet it was clear that
this traditional model has a limited shelf-life."
Vikram wasn't
satisfied with making incremental improvements to the textbook publishing
model. He
wanted to challenge the underlying assumptions
on which that model was based:
Vikram wasn't
satisfied with making incremental improvements to the textbook publishing
model. He wanted to challenge the underlying assumptions on which that model
was based:
- Professors and
teachers "adopt' one
or two textbooks for their courses.
- Students buy these
books for prices ranging up to $150 each.
- Each textbook
is written by one or two experts (often professors) under contract to a publishing
company, in a process that takes at least three years.
- Professors/teachers
assign chapters to students to read and discuss for each class.
So, when Nature Publishing Group (NPG) reached out to Vikram Savkar in 2007
and offered him an opportunity to create a new educational division to reinvent
scientific textbook publishing, he jumped at the chance.
Nature Publishing Group (NPG) is best-known for its flagship Nature international
weekly journal. NPG publishes 30 journals, Scientific American magazine, and
many online databases across the life, physical, and applied sciences and,
most recently, clinical medicine. The Nature.com Web site is one of the most
popular scholarly sites on the Internet, serving almost 12 million visitors
a month. NPG is a subsidiary of MacMillan Publishers, Ltd., which is, in turn,
owned by a German-based, family-run company, Holtzbrinck.
CAN WE IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION?
"If we want kids
to care about science, something very different needs to happen. We know
that students bail out of science at an alarming rate. 47
percent of students who start out of science don't graduate in science1,"
Vikram pointed out.
Vikram felt that students' needs and behaviors had changed and that
traditional textbook publishing companies weren't going to able to move
radically enough to shape the offerings that would replace the current ones. "I
saw an underlying migration of taste combined with slow progress on traditional
products. That creates an opportunity."
How Do Students Want to Interact with Information?
At his last company, Vikram
had spent a lot of time talking with customers—both
students and professors/teachers. "We had a long list of things cued
up that I knew from talking to customers:
- Students learn
from people, not text. They like quick answers from people they trust.
- Students start
everything with an Internet search.
- Students' mindshare is online. Eighty percent of students use Wikipedia
as a first resort. The information they use needs to be online—online
is the foundation. This reversal of polarities—start with online, then
print on demand—is a pretty basic and fundamental shift.
- Students feel
that information should be free and ubiquitous, never mind the irrationality
of that expectation.
- Textbooks are
expensive in a print form and isolated from the scientific community.
- A learning environment
needs to be interactive, so the student can get feedback.
- It needs to be
personalized, based on their strengths and weaknesses, and their learning
style.
- There is a
huge gap between what the students want/need and what they are forced to
buy."
How Receptive are Faculty to Online Learning Resources?
Vikram learned that teachers
and professors who are under sixty years old are more amenable to online
learning solutions than those over sixty. Yet,
he found that, "on the whole, faculty are very clear that running classes
online is an effective way to teach students, letting them learn following
their own learning style, get support, interact with faculty, experts, and
their peers."
What Do Students and Teachers Both Want?
Both students and teachers wanted students to be exposed to authentic scientific
inquiry early in their science education. Inquiry is at the heart of science.
Learning and understanding how scientists do science is important.
Both students and faculty
want to be able to interact directly with each other around the topic(s)
at hand, and also to be able to interact with interested
researchers—the people who are actually engaged in scientific research.
They wanted to get plugged into the scientific community and to leverage that
community as a learning resource.
Scitable
© 2009
Nature Education
This
report continues...
**Endnote**
1) Xianglei Chen, MPR Associates, Inc. and Thomas
Weko, Project Officer National Center for Education Statistics, “Students Who Study Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
in Postsecondary Education,” Stats in Brief, U.S. Department of Education
NCES 2009-161, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education
Statistics, July 2009. (Back to top) |